Quantifying the Unseen Threat with Cyber Risk Quantification

Cyber Risk Quantification: Measuring the Unseen Threat

Bridging the Gap between Cybersecurity and Business Leaders

Tobias Faiss
5 min readNov 20, 2023

--

We are in the midst of an invisible war. We have been for a long time actually — but we don’t really grasp it.
It often eludes our naked eye but holds the power to reshape businesses and redefine success without any limit. It’s the unseen threat, lurking in the shadows of digital landscapes, waiting to pounce when least expected.

In this digital age, where individuals and organization are more connected and dependent on technology than ever, the stakes are also higher than ever, understanding the unseen threats isn’t just a matter of survival; it’s the key to thriving in the digital space. It’s time to bridge the gap, decode the unseen, and fortify the future of our digital landscapes and make them resilient, reliable and secure for everyone.

One of the linchpins in flourishing our digital future lies in the realm of cyber risk quantification: A strategic process that not only brings the invisible to light but also acts as the connector in forging a symbiotic relationship between cybersecurity and business leaders. As we navigate the complex terrain of cybersecurity, it’s crucial to understand the likelihood and potential impact of cyber attacks or security breaches.

Understanding the Implications: The Foundation of Cyber Risk Quantification

Cyber risk quantification is the interface that empowers Cybersecurity experts and business leaders to navigate the intricate web of cyber threats. By delving into this process, we unlock the ability to comprehend the implications and intricacies of potential cyber attacks. The approach is dynamic, with the probability and impact tailored to your company’s unique characteristics — size, threat type, and industry.

The Power of Common Language: Cyber Risk in Monetary Terms

The beauty of a comprehensive cyber risk quantification approach lies in its ability to enhance communication between cyber and business leaders. Imagine translating cyber risks into a common language — monetary terms. This not only provides a clear understanding of financial impact but also enables leaders to allocate resources strategically, prioritize risks effectively, and ascertain the value of various mitigation strategies.

Three Models, One Goal: Enhancing Cyber Risk Management

In our quest for a secure digital future, let’s explore three cyber risk quantification models that can revolutionize how we manage and mitigate cyber risks: NIST SP 800–30, the FAIR model, and Cyber Value at Risk (CVaR).

1. NIST SP 800–30: Shaping Cybersecurity Risks

For organizations benchmarking against the NIST CSF, the NIST 800–30 model offers a comprehensive qualitative cyber security risk assessment. This model aids in identifying and prioritizing potential cybersecurity risks, guiding mitigation strategies, and ensuring an organization’s security posture is effectively managed over time.

NIST SP 800–30: Risk Assessment Process (Source: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf)

Emphasizing alignment with organizational objectives and risk tolerance, it enables a comprehensive understanding of the risk landscape, aiding in informed decision-making for risk response and resource allocation. NIST SP 800–30’s flexibility accommodates organizations of varying sizes and industries, offering a scalable and tailored approach to address individual business needs. As the digital landscape evolves, this document remains a crucial tool, empowering cybersecurity professionals to proactively manage and mitigate risks, reinforcing organizational resilience and share these information with business leaders.

2. The FAIR Model: Monetizing Risk Exposure

FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) is a model that transcends traditional risk analysis by monetizing risk exposure. It enables CISOs and cybersecurity experts to communicate effectively with business leaders, driving informed decision-making around resource allocation and investments. FAIR is especially valuable for mature organizations seeking to establish top-down cyber awareness. At its core, the FAIR model breaks down cybersecurity risks into distinct factors, including the frequency of an event and its probable impact. By assigning monetary values to these factors, FAIR enables organizations to prioritize their cybersecurity efforts based on potential financial losses. This approach fosters a more nuanced understanding of risk, aligning technical assessments with the strategic priorities of the business.

FAIR Model Overview (source: https://www.fairinstitute.org/resources-rebuild/the-fair-model)

FAIR’s adaptability is another strength, accommodating the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats. It provides a scalable and repeatable methodology, offering organizations a dynamic tool to assess, quantify, and prioritize risks. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the FAIR model stands as a valuable ally for organizations striving to fortify their cybersecurity posture in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

3. Cyber Value at Risk (CVaR): Measuring Financial Impacts

The CVaR considers the likelihood of a cyber event and estimates the associated financial impact, providing organizations with a comprehensive tool for risk assessment. At its core, CVaR is influenced by various factors such as vulnerabilities and its exposure to them, digital asset value, and the evolving threat landscape in terms of attacker profiles. Quantifying the impact of cybersecurity incidents involves evaluating direct financial losses, operational disruptions, reputational harm, and potential regulatory penalties.

Components for measuring Cyber Value at Risk (source: https://deloitte.wsj.com/cio/the-benefits-limits-of-cyber-value-at-risk-1430712132)

The interconnected nature of supply chains and third-party relationships further complicates this assessment, necessitating a holistic understanding of an organization’s risk profile. As cyber threats escalate, organizations are increasingly turning to cyber insurance that covers CVaR, offering financial protection against potential losses. However, challenges persist in accurately calculating CVaR, given the dynamic nature of cyber threats and the evolving tactics of malicious actors.

The Path Forward: Enhance Cyber Risk Management with Risk Analysis

As cyber takes center stage in business success, effective communication with executive leadership and the Board is non-negotiable. The adoption of cyber risk quantification approaches empowers security and risk teams to deliver actionable insights, leveraging real-time cybersecurity risk assessments. Those, who are capable of showcasing cyber risks effectively to their boards, will have a invaluable advantage over their peers.

And this will lead in more efficient Cybersecurity investments, less resource conflicts and finally in a more resilient and secure organization.

About Tobias Faiss

Tobias is a Senior Engineering Manager, focusing on applied Leadership, Analytics and Cyber Resilience. He has a track record of 18+ year in managing software-projects, -services and -teams in the United States, EMEA and Asia-Pacific. He currently leads several multinational teams in Germany, India, Singapore and Vietnam. Also, he is the founder of the delta2 edventures project where its mission is to educate students, IT professionals and executives to build a digital connected, secure and reliable world and provides training for individuals.

Tobias’ latest book is ‘The Art of IT-Management: How to Successfully Lead Your Company Into the Digital Future’. You can also contact him on his personal website tobiasfaiss.com

--

--